Hebert Abstract Company, Inc. v. Touchstone Properties, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that court should consider pleadings and judicially noticed facts
• holding the court should consider pleadings and judicially noticed facts
• stating Rule 12(c) motion is only proper where material facts are not in dispute
• A Rule 12(c) motion “is designed to dispose of cases where the material facts are not in dispute and a judgment on the merits can be rendered by looking to the substance of the pleadings.”
• a Rule 12(c) motion \is designed to dispose of cases where the material facts are not in dispute and a judgment on the merits can be rendered by looking to the substance of the pleadings and any judicially noticed facts\
• a Rule 12(c) motion “is designed to dispose of cases where the material facts are not 24 in dispute and a judgment on the merits can be rendered by looking to the substance of the 25 pleadings and any judicially noticed facts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).