Skip to main content
· 3/10/2005

Hebei Metals & Minerals Import & Export Corp. v. United States

Citations

  • 366 F. Supp. 2d 1264
  • 29 Ct. Int'l Trade 288
  • 29 C.I.T. 288
  • 27 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1502
  • 2005 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 34

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, where agency failed to demonstrate that import statistics were sufficiently “product specific,” it was irrelevant whether statistics satisfied other criteria
  • explaining that, where agency failed to demonstrate that import statistics were sufficiently “product specific,” it was irrelevant whether statistics satisfied other criteria
  • rejecting notion that Commerce is permitted to rely on a surrogate value that has \an unexplained relation\ to the input (factor of production
  • ordering Commerce to either “adhere to its conditional preference for domestic surrogate data or ... state that it is deviating from this practice and provide a rational explanation for doing so.”
  • ordering Commerce to either “adhere to its conditional preference for domestic surrogate data or. . . state that it is deviating from this practice and provide a rational explanation for doing so.”
  • “A broad and unsupported coal value falls short of a substantial evidentiary basis just as a narrow and unsupported coal value does.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Restani

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.