Skip to main content
· 3/27/1980

Heaton v. Imus

Citations

  • 608 P.2d 631
  • 93 Wash. 2d 249
  • 1980 Wash. LEXIS 1270

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “ [q]uantum meruit is not a legal obligation like quasi contract, but is rather a remedy: ‘a reasonable amount for work done,’ ” granting “quantum meruit” recovery on the basis of a quasi-contract claim
  • \A contract implied in fact is an agreement of the parties arrived at from their conduct rather than their expressions of assent.\
  • “A contract implied in fact is an agreement of the parties arrived at from their conduct rather than their expressions of assent.”
  • lost profits an appropriate element in quantum meruit recovery
  • applying quantum meruit to contract implied in law
  • applying quantum meruit to contract implied in law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.