· 3/27/1980
Heaton v. Imus
Citations
- 608 P.2d 631
- 93 Wash. 2d 249
- 1980 Wash. LEXIS 1270
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “ [q]uantum meruit is not a legal obligation like quasi contract, but is rather a remedy: ‘a reasonable amount for work done,’ ” granting “quantum meruit” recovery on the basis of a quasi-contract claim
- \A contract implied in fact is an agreement of the parties arrived at from their conduct rather than their expressions of assent.\
- “A contract implied in fact is an agreement of the parties arrived at from their conduct rather than their expressions of assent.”
- lost profits an appropriate element in quantum meruit recovery
- applying quantum meruit to contract implied in law
- applying quantum meruit to contract implied in law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.