Heather Hall Corp. v. Haines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the typicality requirement does not mandate that products purchased or methods of purchase of the named plaintiffs be the same as those of absent class members provided that the cause of action arises from a common wrong
• “[C]ommon liability issues such as conspiracy or monopolization have, almost invariably, been held to predominate over individual issues.”
• Daubert test is limited at class certification stage to whether expert evidence is inadmissible as a matter of law
• Daubert inquiry inappropriate at class certification stage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).