Heath v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ ‘No presumption of prejudice exists in these circumstances; no irregularity or impropriety is involved in [these] juror[s’] conduct.’ ”
• “Where the date alleged in the indictment is not a material element of the offense, the State may prove the offense as of any date within the statute of limitation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cowan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-05-24· cited 10×
• Flores v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-01-11· cited 8×
• Clark v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-01-28· cited 5×
• Estuardo Canales v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-06-15

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Caldwell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1976-07-09· cited 41×
• Miller v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-05-09· cited 18×
• Geckles v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-11-12· cited 10×
• Munn v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-05-20· cited 9×
• McLamb v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-10-03· cited 8×
• Riles v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-09-05· cited 6×
• Brundage v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2001-06-11· cited 1×