Heath v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “argument (that virgins are less likely to consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bryant v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2005-06-24· cited 6×
• People v. Wigfall
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-04-20· cited 4×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hawley v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1980-07-25· cited 97×
• Page v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1983-01-21· cited 83×
• Gonzales v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1984-11-15· cited 22×
• Kvasnikoff v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1983-12-09· cited 20×
• Daniels v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1989-01-20· cited 17×
• People v. Johnson
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1983-05-12· cited 13×
• State Farm Insurance Co. v. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1992-12-11· cited 9×
• Keogh v. W.R. Grasle, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1991-08-30· cited 7×