Heath v. Heath

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Under the doctrine of Settle, this Court will continue to construe a conveyance to a husband and wife in joint tenancy as a tenancy by the entireties.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Randall E. Sebold, Sr. v. Irene H. Sebold
  D.C. Circuit· 1971-02-12· cited 29×
• Travis v. Benson
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-07-14· cited 17×
• Roberts & Lloyd, Inc. v. Zyblut
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-03-20· cited 11×
• Erma Hogan v. John R. Hogan
  D.C. Circuit· 1957-11-27· cited 10×
• Eleanor M. Benson, James A. Travis v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1971-03-16· cited 8×
• Hardy v. Hardy
  District of Columbia· 1966-02-23· cited 8×
• Curles v. Curles
  District of Columbia· 1955-12-15· cited 3×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Settle v. Settle
  D.C. Circuit· 1925-11-02· cited 29×
• Scholl v. Scholl
  D.C. Circuit· 1945-12-17· cited 10×