Heath v. Heath

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating a Husband's future earning potential was inherently speculative and remanding for the trial court to consider the parties' current financial situations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Donahue v. Donahue
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-09-25· cited 100×
• Alicia Cohen v. Woland Cohen
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2022-08-03

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bigham v. Bigham
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-03-13· cited 33×
• Helm v. Helm
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-06-30· cited 7×