Skip to main content
· 5/12/2009

Heartland Regional Medical Center v. Sebelius

Citations

  • 566 F.3d 193
  • 386 U.S. App. D.C. 10
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 10205
  • 2009 WL 1361895

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Failure to provide the required notice and to invite public comment ... is a fundamental flaw that 'normally' requires vacatur of the rule.\
  • “Failure to provide the required notice and to invite public comment . . . is a fundamental flaw that ‘normally’ requires vacatur of the rule.”
  • “When an agency may be able readily to cure a defect in its explanation of a decision, the first factor in Allied-Signal counsels remand without vacatur.”
  • “When an agency may be able readily to cure a defect in its explanation of a decision, the first factor in Alliedr-Signal counsels remand without vacatur.”
  • “When an agency may be able readily to cure a defect in its explanation of a decision, the first factor in Allied–Signal counsels remand without vacatur.”
  • “[T]he terms ‘invalid’ and ‘vacated’ are not synonyms.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Tatel, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.