Heartland Hospital v. Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that judgment was ambiguous where judgment remanded case to administrative agency “for action consistent with the'foregoing opinion”
• stating that Heartland I found nothing wrong with the regulation itself
• dismissing plaintiff’s case with prejudice, finding “manipulation 9 of IFP system” regarding settlement checks and related disclosures to the court
• “in a case involving APA-based judicial review . . . if the agency has not considered all relevant factors . . . the proper course, except in rare circumstances, is to remand to 3 See Administrative Record, [Civil Action] No. 1:07-cv-0148[4] (“2001 A.R.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).