Heart of Texas Dodge, Inc. v. Star Coach, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that primary purpose of repair contract was provision of services because repair company purchased conversion package it installed from a third-party vendor
• explaining that the contract was for services rather than goods when the purpose of the contract was to customize a vehicle and the parts purchased to do so were only incidental to the service
• explaining that services were anything but inci- dental to customizing a vehicle
• ruling custom conversion of new vehicle is “closely analogous to repair cases” so “the UCC does not apply” (citing Am. Warehouse & Moving Serv. of Atlanta, Inc. v. Floyd’s Diesel Servs., Inc., 296 S.E.2d 64, 66 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982
• “If a contract involves only the sale of goods, the UCC applies. If a contract involves the rendition of services, the UCC does not apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).