Hears v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the new criminal charges are withdrawn, a parolee is entitled to credit against the original sentence for the parolee’s pre-sentence confinement
• holding that 12 whether bail is paid is irrelevant in determining whether a petitioner was held solely on the Board’s detainer
• stating that “when an offender is held solely on the Board’s detainer he is entitled to credit for that time against his original sentence”
• new sentence of four days less than pre-sentence custody time of four months, twenty days

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).