Skip to main content

Heard v. State

Citations

  • 876 S.W.2d 231
  • 316 Ark. 731
  • 1994 Ark. LEXIS 277

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the State is not limited to the methods of proof listed in section 5-4- 504(b)
  • holding that it is not necessary for the State to prove an accused physically held the contraband in order to sustain a conviction if the location of the contraband was such that it can be said to be under the dominion and control of the accused
  • where the affiant merely stated that “during the investigation, affiant [Officer Stovall] received information from a person proven to be reliable on several occasions, who has observed cocaine being possessed, used, and sold at the above described residence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dudley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.