Heard v. Higginbotham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an administrator’s conflict of interest did not render a decision to deny benefits unreasonable where, among other things, the administrator used a third party to review and answer financial questions that arose in connection with claims
• finding no abuse of discretion where insurer included insured’s profit sharing bonus as disability earnings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).