Skip to main content

Heard v. Heard

Citations

  • 614 A.2d 255
  • 418 Pa. Super. 250
  • 1992 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2664

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court was without authority to enter sua sponte a mutual no abuse order when one party did not file a petition under the PFA Act
  • finding duration of protective order is subject to abuse of discretion standard of review and may only be overturned where the trial court’s decision was manifestly unreasonable
  • finding duration of protective order is subject to abuse of discretion standard of review and may only be overturned where the trial court’s decision was “manifestly unreasonable”
  • “On appeal, it is not the duty of this court to find facts….”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rowley, Kelly, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.