Heard v. Cherry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Amazon is an interactive service provider based on the plaintiff’s allegations that Amazon “operates a website that allows consumers to purchase items online”
• holding that 6 Amazon is an interactive service provider because Amazon “operates a website that 7 allows consumers to purchase items online”
• concluding that Amazon was not acting as an information 10 content provider where plaintiff’s claims arose from the allegedly defamatory statements 11 in reviews posted by third parties
• finding Amazon.com to offer an “interactive computer service” because 23 plaintiff “allege[d] that Amazon operates a website that allows consumers to purchase items 24 online, i.e., to access [its] servers by placing orders”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).