Skip to main content
· 7/11/1945

Healy v. New York Central Railroad

Citations

  • 326 Ill. App. 556
  • 62 N.E.2d 707
  • 1945 Ill. App. LEXIS 374

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • although plaintiffs opposed defendant’s employment practices, because plaintiffs did not establish that the opposition was in response to racial policies, “it was not the type of protected activity contemplated within a Title VII . . . retaliation claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolfe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.