Healy v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Labor Management Relations Act preempted employees’ tortious-interference claims against third party because resolution of the claims required interpretation of the relevant CBA
• explaining that Section 301 [of the Labor- Management Relations Act] preempts not only claims “founded directly’ on the [CBA], but also state law claims that indirectly implicate a [CBA].”
• finding the LMRA preempted a claim under Illinois law for tortious interference with contract that includes similar elements
• affirming district court’s dismissal of tortious interference claim because it was preempted by the LMRA
• affirming district court’s dismissal of tortious interference claim because it was preempted by the LMRA
• “However, we deem a dismissal of preempted state law claims a 12(b)(6) dismissal for failure to state a claim, a dismissal on the merits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nicholas Webb v. Michael Frawley
  Seventh Circuit· 2018-10-11· cited 104×
• Mission Measurement Corp. v. Blackbaud, Inc.
  E.D. Illinois· 2017-12-13· cited 26×
• Cox v. Calumet Public Schools District 132
  N.D. Illinois· 2016-04-18· cited 15×
• Carter v. Pallante
  N.D. Illinois· 2017-06-09· cited 10×
• Boogaard v. National Hockey League
  N.D. Illinois· 2015-12-18· cited 9×
• Miller v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.
  N.D. Illinois· 2016-01-19· cited 5×
• Ciolino v. Seterus, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2016-08-16· cited 2×
• International Ass'n of Machinists District 10 v. Wisconsin
  W.D. Wisconsin· 2016-07-12
• Sylvester Wince v. Joe Hernandez
  Seventh Circuit· 2023-05-02

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-09· cited 6,547×
• Vaca v. Sipes
  Supreme Court· 1967-02-27· cited 4,450×
• Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.
  Supreme Court· 1957-06-03· cited 2,816×
• Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck
  Supreme Court· 1985-04-16· cited 2,375×
• Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 1,828×
• Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.
  Supreme Court· 1962-03-05· cited 1,331×
• United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Mitchell
  Supreme Court· 1981-04-20· cited 878×
• HPI Health Care Services, Inc. v. Mt. Vernon Hospital, Inc.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1989-09-27· cited 661×
• Aaron McCoy v. Iberdrola Renewables, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2014-07-28· cited 325×
• Michelle Brazinski v. Amoco Petroleum Additives Company and Buck Isbell
  Seventh Circuit· 1993-09-09· cited 240×
• Mohanty v. St. John Heart Clinic, S.C.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2006-12-21· cited 204×
• Firestone Financial Corp. v. Meyer
  Seventh Circuit· 2015-08-10· cited 204×
• Evergreen Square v. Wisconsin Housing & Economic Development Authority
  Seventh Circuit· 2015-01-12· cited 183×
• Fortres Grand Corporation v. Warner Brothers Entertainment
  Seventh Circuit· 2014-08-14· cited 177×
• Eugene Bailey v. City of Chicago
  Seventh Circuit· 2015-03-06· cited 111×
• Northeastern Rural Electric Membership Corp. v. Wabash Valley Power Ass'n
  Seventh Circuit· 2013-02-22· cited 88×
• Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. Stewart
  Supreme Court· 2011-04-19· cited 30×
• Lonnie Kimbro v. Pepsico, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2000-06-02· cited 24×
• Voelker v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2003-12-12· cited 13×