Skip to main content
· 9/30/1992

Health Systems Marketing & Development Corp. v. United States

Citations

  • 26 Cl. Ct. 1322
  • 42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,285
  • 1992 U.S. Claims LEXIS 451
  • 1992 WL 245596

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that California’s 27 standing requirements for the UCL, FAL, and CLRA only require 28 “an economic injury-in-fact, which demands no more than the 1 corresponding requirement under Article III of the 2 Constitution.”
  • declining equitable tolling where counsel chose to pursue 27 clemency instead of filing a timely federal habeas petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bruggink

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.