Health Grades, Inc. v. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Most courts hold that this fact-intensive question, however analyzed, is not appropriate for determination on a motion to dismiss, but should be determined on summary judgment or at trial.”
• “In fact, the very nature of [the] product . . . carries with it at least the possibility that consumers will consider [Fund 7]’s use of [Plaintiffs]’ marks . . . an implied endorsement by [Plaintiffs] of [Fund 7] and the services it provides.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).