Healey v. Coury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Arizona courts allow for recovery of future damages due to anticipatory repudiation even when “the contract has been rendered unilateral because the plaintiff has fully performed at the time of the repudiation”
• upholding jury instruction stating that \the burden of proof as to a matter which is peculiarly within the knowledge or control of the opposite party is placed on that party\
• civil racketeering damages are not remedial; however, holding limited to the prospective nature of the statute
• “generally, a party must establish a fact which is essential to his claim ... however, the burden of proof as to a matter which is peculiarly within the knowledge or control of the opposite party is placed on that party”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).