Heady v. Wood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing die holding and analysis in Murdock as “firmly tethered” to the text of K.S.A. 21-471 l[e] and thus limited to out-of-state convictions
• consideration of Descamps claim for first time on appeal necessary to serve ends of justice and to prevent denial of fundamental right
• detailed discussion of categorical versus modified categorical approaches
• subsequently affirmed in Dickey I
• subsequently affirmed in Dickey I

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).