Skip to main content
· 5/1/1956

Headley v. Ostroot

Citations

  • 76 N.W.2d 474
  • 76 S.D. 246
  • 1956 S.D. LEXIS 14

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that substantial compliance with statutes relating to petition and referendum is necessary to \prevent fraud or corruption in securing the petitions\
  • statutory requirement that signer state both residence address and post office address not subject to substantial compliance analysis; both place of residence and post office address are essential elements of the law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rudolph

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.