Headley v. Chrysler Motor Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that plaintiffs included the phrase “scrapie or any other type of [TSE]” in order to “signify the fact that no other regulations applied to the diagnosis of TSEs in sheep”
• “If the rule is to promote effective discovery regarding corporations, the spokesperson must 13 be informed.”
• If corporation does not possess the knowledge necessary to prepare a designee, “then its obligations under Rule 30(b)(6) obviously cease, [because] the rule requires testimony only as to ‘matters known or reasonably available to the organization.’” (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).