Headen v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• pro se plaintiff did not argue that WMATA’s discretion to terminate her was limited by any law or policy and WMATA’s dismissal letter to the plaintiff listed a “series of incidents” she was involved in

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).