Head v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that social security disability benefits are not child support and therefore not subject to state and federal assignment of rights requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Graby v. Graby
  New York Court of Appeals· 1996-02-08· cited 65×
• Stultz v. Stultz
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1995-12-28· cited 47×
• Walling v. Appel Service Co., Inc.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-10-19· cited 39×
• Steward v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-06-14· cited 32×
• Young v. Young
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1995-08-23· cited 18×
• In Re the Marriage of Jackson
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1997-05-30· cited 15×
• In Re Marriage of Hollingsworth
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1996-10-08· cited 6×
• Stultz v. Stultz
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-12-15· cited 6×
• Brown v. Brown
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-03-21· cited 5×
• Sharon Stroup Dorscher v. Robert Dale Stroup (mem. dec,)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-06-29

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sullivan v. Stroop
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-14· cited 408×
• Dusenberry v. Dusenberry
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1993-12-06· cited 59×
• S.M v. v. Littlepage
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1982-12-21· cited 42×
• State Ex Rel. Southwell v. Chamberland
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-02-01· cited 35×
• City and County of San Francisco v. Thompson
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-09-26· cited 31×
• In the Matter of Hulbert Eugene Stovall, A/K/A Gene Stovall, Bankrupt-Appellant
  Seventh Circuit· 1983-11-28· cited 20×
• Pratt v. Wilson
  E.D. California· 1991-07-12· cited 12×
• Halliday v. Auburn Mobile Homes
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1987-08-26· cited 8×
• Winchell v. Winchell
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-06-27· cited 2×
• Stanton v. Price
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1978-12-29· cited 1×
• Potts v. Potts
  Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 1992-04-07· cited 1×