Head v. Inova Health Care Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well-established that arguments may not be made for the first time in a reply brief.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• ““[R]eply papers may properly address new material issues raised in the opposition papers so as to avoid giving unfair advantage to the answering party.’”
• “It is well-established that arguments may not be made for the first time in a reply brief.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).