Skip to main content
· 11/24/1993

Heacock v. Ivorette-Texas, Inc.

Citations

  • 20 Cal. App. 4th 1665
  • 26 Cal. Rptr. 2d 257
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8757
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 14913
  • 1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 1184

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In deciding whether the plaintiffs appeal is inconsistent with having accepted the benefits of the judgment, we focus solely on the relief sought by the plaintiff, not on arguments made by a cross-appealing defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiener

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.