· 11/24/1993
Heacock v. Ivorette-Texas, Inc.
Citations
- 20 Cal. App. 4th 1665
- 26 Cal. Rptr. 2d 257
- 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8757
- 93 Daily Journal DAR 14913
- 1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 1184
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In deciding whether the plaintiffs appeal is inconsistent with having accepted the benefits of the judgment, we focus solely on the relief sought by the plaintiff, not on arguments made by a cross-appealing defendant.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wiener
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.