H.E. Stevenson v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendant’s appeal was not frivolous despite waiver of right to challenge admissibility because the arguments on appeal “do not solely address the reliability of the evidence or its admissibility”
• affirming jury verdict on trespass claim for emissions from nearby petrochemical plant, based on expert testimony
• affirming jury verdict on trespass claim for emissions from nearby petrochemical plant, based on expert testimony
• “Although DuPont lost the right to challenge the admissibility of the evidence, it did not lose the right to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence.”
• “Daubert did not change the traditional role of a sufficiency inquiry, but only expanded the trial court’s role regarding the admissibility of expert evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).