H.D. Corp. Of Puerto Rico and H.D. 65, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Ford Motor Company Caribbean, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “we have said that plaintiffs have an adequate remedy in the commonwealth courts to vindicate their claims against both [defendants]”
• reciting Fed. R. Civ. P. 19(b) factors and affirming dismissal of action where non-diverse parent company was indispensable party in part because it was signatory to agreements at issue
• nondiverse parent corporation was indispensable because it was a signatory to the agreements at issue in the litigation and plaintiffs’ claims were largely directed against it, not the diverse defendant subsidiary corporation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).