HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA v. Hillman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that the legislature’s enactment of section 95.051 establishes exclusive list of conditions that can toll a statute of limitations, effectively eliminating the concept of “equitable tolling”
• noting that application of equitable estoppel doctrine requires presence of “active deception or misconduct”
• declining to expand the “misled or lulled” standard beyond “the administrative law context” because, for civil cases, “the legislature has made clear its intent to exclude all tolling exceptions not listed in” Section 95.051
• “We are not persuaded that our supreme court would allow the doctrine [of equitable tolling] to be applied in civil action[s] such as the Plaintiffs’.”
• “We are not persuaded that our supreme court would allow the doctrine [of equitable tolling] to be applied in civil action[s] such as the Plaintiffs’.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).