Hazle v. Ford Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in the employment context, to establish a prima facie case of discrimination a complainant must “present evidence that (1) she belongs to a protected class, (2) she suffered an adverse employment action, (3) she was qualified for the position, and (4
• holding that in the employment context, to establish a prima facie case of discrimination a complainant must “present evidence that (1) she belongs to a protected class, (2) she suffered an adverse employment action, (3) she was qualified for the position, and (4
• holding that in the employment context, to establish a prima facie case of discrimination a complainant must “present evidence that (1) she belongs to a protected class, (2) she suffered an adverse employment action, (3) she was qualified for the position, and (4
• stating that a plaintiff “must not merely raise a triable issue that the employer’s proffered reason was pretextual, but that it was a pretext for [unlawful] discrimination.”
• explaining that statements made by the plaintiff’s attorney were “clearly . . . an inappropriate means of opposing a motion for summary disposition brought under MCR 2.116(C)(10)”
• finding plaintiff suffered an adverse employment action when “she did not receive the promotion for which she was denied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).