· 4/1/1929
Hazen v. Mullen
Citations
- 32 F.2d 394
- 59 App. D.C. 3
- 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3772
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to address whether Davis applies to right to silence cases
- leaving it an open ques- tion whether, “notwithstanding . . . Davis [v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (1994)], a defendant who wishes to assert his right to remain silent may do so by simply remaining silent in the face of interrogation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.