Skip to main content
· 4/1/1929

Hazen v. Mullen

Citations

  • 32 F.2d 394
  • 59 App. D.C. 3
  • 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3772

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to address whether Davis applies to right to silence cases
  • leaving it an open ques- tion whether, “notwithstanding . . . Davis [v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (1994)], a defendant who wishes to assert his right to remain silent may do so by simply remaining silent in the face of interrogation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.