Skip to main content
· 11/1/1989

Hazen First State Bank v. Phillip Speight, Small Business Administration

Citations

  • 888 F.2d 574
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 16332
  • 19 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1670
  • 1989 WL 129173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that section 108(c) does not extend the expiration date of a subordination agreement between two creditors
  • “[S]ection 108(c) has no application to an agreement fixing the time to maintain the Bank’s lien priority pursuant to an agreement between the Bank and the” other secured creditor. (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lay, Heaney, Beam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.