Hazel Thomas v. James Buckley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “obvious incorrigibility” “weigh[s] in favor” of departing up (citations omitted)
• upholding a suspect’s second pat down where “the first patdown was quick and cursory” and the police had seized a weapon from his companion
• sustaining a second pat-down where \the first pat[-]down was quick and cursory\ and police seized a weapon from the suspect's companion
• “[T]he district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that [the defendant’s] obvious incorrigibility demonstrates that leniency has not been effective and that as a result, the factors weigh in favor of a decision to upwardly depart.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).