Hazel Green Oil & Gas Co. v. Collier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying a litigant’s leave to file a surreply where the opponent’s reply brief arguments were merely responses to arguments the litigant made in its response brief
• denying motion for leave to file sur-reply because “[t]hough the City makes new subject matter jurisdiction arguments in its reply, the arguments respond directly to those Clear Channel makes in its response”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).