Hazard v. State, 2005-2870 (r.I.super. 2006)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “Scott is applicable only if there are 'objective facts in the record, such as a video, showing that one party’s account is simply beyond belief’
• “[B]ecause the ALJ gave specific, clear and 3 convincing reasons for finding [plaintiff] not fully credible, 4 any error in the additional reasons the ALJ provided . . . was 5 harmless.”
• “[B]lecause the ALJ 23 gave specific, clear and convincing reasons [for discounting plaintiff’s symptom statements], any error in the additional reasons the ALJ provided . . . was harmless.” (citation 25 omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).