Hazard v. Illinois Central Railroad
Citations
- 67 Miss. 32
Syllabus
<p>1. Common Carriers. Bill of lading. Evidence. Bona fide holders. Act of March 16, 1886.</p> <p>This statute (Laws 1886, p. 93), provides that bills of lading shall be conclusive evidence in the hands of a bona fide holder against the person or corporation issuing the same that the property was actually received for shipment. This is not a mere rule of evidence, but was designed to change the character and legal effect of the contract. It does not apply to a bill of lading issued prior to its passage.</p> <p>2. Bill or Ladino. Assignment. Negotiability. Bona fide holder. Act of March 16, 1886.</p> <p>In the absence of a statute to the contrary, a bill of lading is not governed by the law merchant. Therefore in an action on a bill of lading, issued prior to the aforesaid aqt of 1886, any defense available to a carrier as against the party to whom it was issued may be set up against an assignee thereof, although the latter be a holder for value without notice.</p>
Judges: Campbell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Street v. Farmers' Elevator Co.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1914-11-24· cited 10×
- Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. BentMississippi Supreme Court· 1909-03-15· cited 7×
- Roy & Roy v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1906-04-19· cited 3×
- Loyd v. Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham RailroadMississippi Supreme Court· 1906-04-15· cited 2×
- Illinois Central Railroad v. DoughtyCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1912-01-15· cited 1×
- Wilbour v. HeglerSixth Circuit· 1894-05-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.