Skip to main content
· 8/18/2016

Haywood Y. Shirley v. David and Brenda Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that when ascertaining legislative intent, we interpret the statute so that no part of it is redundant or irrelevant
  • explaining that when ascertaining legislative intent, we interpret the statute so that no part of it is redundant or irrelevant
  • noting we generally “hear a case on appeal in the same manner in which it was tried in the district court” (citation omitted)
  • stating that the court “examine[s] statutory language holistically”
  • “We also examine statutory language holistically.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.