· 8/18/2016
Haywood Y. Shirley v. David and Brenda Johnson
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that when ascertaining legislative intent, we interpret the statute so that no part of it is redundant or irrelevant
- explaining that when ascertaining legislative intent, we interpret the statute so that no part of it is redundant or irrelevant
- noting we generally “hear a case on appeal in the same manner in which it was tried in the district court” (citation omitted)
- stating that the court “examine[s] statutory language holistically”
- “We also examine statutory language holistically.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.