Skip to main content
· 1/25/2000

Haywood v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 92 Cal. Rptr. 2d 182
  • 77 Cal. App. 4th 949
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 646
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 961
  • 2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 45

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that, at the time the action was commenced, the unborn child did not have a home state under the UCCJA, but determining that the California court had jurisdiction under the former significant-connection test of the UCCJA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Curry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.