Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 9/20/1993
Hayward v. Hayward
Citations
- 630 A.2d 1275
- 428 Pa. Super. 332
- 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3140
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- disability payments are not subject to equitable distribution unless they can be fairly characterized as retirement pension benefits or some other form of marital property
- disability payments are not subject to equitable distribution unless they can be fairly characterized as retirement pension benefits or some other form of marital property
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sole, Beck, Hester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Braderman v. BradermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-02-08· cited 90×
- Murphy v. MurphySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-10-03· cited 56×
- Ciliberti v. CilibertiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-06-10· cited 39×
- Berrington v. BerringtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-09-09· cited 27×
- Malseed v. MalseedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-10-23· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.