Haysville U.S.D. No. 261 v. GAF Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that one of the traditional situations in which claims of indemnity are allowed is when there is an expressed contract of indemnity, such as a hold harmless agreement
• the comparative negligence statute applies to warranty claims seeking to recover for death, personal injury or physical damage to property
• \The use of the comparative negligence theory is not proper in breach of contract actions.\
• “The use of the comparative negligence theory is not proper in breach of contract actions.”
• when breach of warranty causes death, personal injury, or damage to property comparative negligence statute will apply because it is akin to an action in tort
• express and implied contractual indemnity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).