Skip to main content
· 11/30/1989

Hays v. Vanek

Citations

  • 217 Cal. App. 3d 271
  • 266 Cal. Rptr. 856
  • 1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 1232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • whether owner offered to dedicate “is a question of fact requiring an examination of all the pertinent circumstances”
  • The inference that public use constitutes acceptance of an offer of dedication is dependent in large part on the fact that the public is using the piece of property offered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiener

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.