Skip to main content
· 6/6/1996

Hays v. State of Alabama

Citations

  • 85 F.3d 1492
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding presumed prejudice when counsel absent, prevented from assisting during a critical phase, or failed to subject prosecution’s case to meaningful adversarial testing
  • finding no due process violation where “there ha[d] been no showing that [the witness’s] later, rather than earlier, testimony was false”
  • finding no due process violation where “there ha[d] been no showing that [the witness’s] later, rather than earlier, testimony was false”
  • prejudice presumed when counsel absent, prevented from assisting during critical state, or if counsel failed to subject prosecution's case to meaningful adversarial testing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kravitch, Edmondson, Birch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.