· 6/6/1996
Hays v. State of Alabama
Citations
- 85 F.3d 1492
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13450
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding presumed prejudice when counsel absent, prevented from assisting during a critical phase, or failed to subject prosecution’s case to meaningful adversarial testing
- finding no due process violation where “there ha[d] been no showing that [the witness’s] later, rather than earlier, testimony was false”
- finding no due process violation where “there ha[d] been no showing that [the witness’s] later, rather than earlier, testimony was false”
- prejudice presumed when counsel absent, prevented from assisting during critical state, or if counsel failed to subject prosecution's case to meaningful adversarial testing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kravitch, Edmondson, Birch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.