Arizona Supreme Court· 1/21/1964
Hays v. Richardson
Citations
- 386 P.2d 791
- 95 Ariz. 64
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is 2 undisputed that if one spouse is negligent while furthering a community purpose, the 3 community is liable for damages resulting therefrom.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jennings, Bernstein, Udall, Struckmeyer, Lockwood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Depinto v. Provident Security Life Insurance CompanyNinth Circuit· 1967-02-24· cited 22×
- Cook v. CookCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-03-18· cited 11×
- Hays v. RichardsonArizona Supreme Court· 1964-02-13· cited 11×
- Howe v. HaughtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-12-19· cited 10×
- Rustin v. CookCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-10-25· cited 10×
- Reckart v. Avra Valley Air, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-04-25· cited 6×
- Ehman v. RathbunCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-06-02· cited 5×
- Bowslaugh v. BowslaughCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-08-07· cited 1×
- DePinto v. Provident Security Life InsuranceNinth Circuit· 1967-02-24· cited 1×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Putnam v. PutnamArizona Supreme Court· 1890-04-18· cited 28×
- McFadden v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court· 1938-01-10· cited 25×
- Rodgers v. BryanArizona Supreme Court· 1957-04-08· cited 21×
- Chapman v. SalazarArizona Supreme Court· 1932-05-16· cited 7×
- Newhall v. PorterArizona Supreme Court· 1900-11-09· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.