Skip to main content
· 11/15/1973

Hays v. Pigg

Citations

  • 515 P.2d 924
  • 267 Or. 143
  • 1973 Ore. LEXIS 282

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding, in reliance on former ORS 20.210, that trial court did not abuse its discretion by permitting amendment of statement of costs and disbursements
  • creating exceptions to rule of segregation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connell, McAllister, Holman, Tongue, Howell, Bryson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.