· 7/15/1841
Hays v. Lasater
Citations
- 3 Ark. 565
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that plaintiff waived its pre-award protest when the plaintiff “could have and should have protested immediately after its meeting with [the contracting officer]”
- “If the allegations are correct and the Government were obligated to rebid the contracts, [the] plaintiff could win with resubmitted proposals.”
- “If the allegations are correct and the Government were obligated to rebid the contracts, plaintiff could win with resubmitted proposals.”
- “If the allegations are correct and the Government were obligated to rebid the contracts, plaintiff could win with resubmitted proposals.”
- “a disappointed bidder is not necessarily stripped of his standing to protest because he is eliminated from the competitive range. The court must consider why the bidder was eliminated”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dickinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.