Skip to main content
· 6/20/1919

Hays v. Lackey

Citations

  • 185 Ky. 17
  • 213 S.W. 205
  • 1919 Ky. LEXIS 230

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that opposing party could argue 16 that allegations in prior pleading were “prior judicial admission[s]” with “evidentiary force”
  • recognizing that Buckeye put challenges based on mental capacity to contract into the contract-formation bucket
  • requiring the party seeking to 26 enforce a purported agreement to arbitrate to prove specific knowledge of the arbitration 27 provision
  • “The amendment of a pleading does 28 1 not make it any the less an admission of the party”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.