Hays v. Gilliam

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that investor-purchaser of apartment building can protect itself through inspections and express warranties
• “[T]he purchaser of an apartment house is not a ‘naive home buyer’, but an investor in a commercial enterprise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Revak v. SEC Realty Corp.
  Second Circuit· 1994-02-23· cited 50×
• Adams v. Dean Roofing Co., Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1986-03-07· cited 48×
• Luana Savings Bank v. Pro-Build Holdings, Inc. and United Building Centers
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2014-12-12· cited 25×
• McClure v. Sennstrom
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-11-14· cited 10×
• Amended February 23, 2015 Luana Savings Bank v. Pro-Build Holdings, Inc. and United Building Centers
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2014-12-12

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dixon v. Mountain City Construction Co.
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1982-05-03· cited 35×
• Pollard v. Saxe & Yolles Development Co.
  California Supreme Court· 1974-08-20· cited 24×
• Cooper v. CORDOVA SAND AND GRAVEL COMPANY, INC.
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1971-08-18· cited 22×
• Belote Ex Rel. Parker v. Memphis Development Co.
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1961-05-05· cited 17×