Skip to main content
· 9/4/1992

Hays County Guardian v. Jerome K. Supple

Citations

  • 969 F.2d 111
  • 1992 WL 188781

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that public university campus was a designated pub- lic forum because a university rule opened the campus to speech activities
  • holding that a university could not favor its official stu- dent paper over competing papers
  • holding that a public university campus was a designated public forum for student speech given historical practice and policy
  • holding that a university could not favor its official stu- dent paper over competing papers
  • holding that public university campus was a designated pub- lic forum because a university rule opened the campus to speech activities
  • holding that the Eleventh Amendment bars state-law claims against university officials in their official capacities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goldberg, Higginbotham, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.